If OPs live into Models, Observers are the objects which are interested in being notified when an OP gets changed. An Observer observes one or more Models.
A typical observer is an instance of class gtkmvc.Controller which derive from gtkmvc.Observer.
Also gtkmvc.Model derives from gtkmvc.Observer, as in hierarchies of models parents sometimes observe children.
Important
Since version 1.99.1, observers were deeply revised. If you have experience with older versions, you will find many changes. In particular the usage of name-based notification methods like property_<name>_value_change is discouraged, but still supported for backward compatibility. At the end of this section all discouraged/deprecated features about observers are listed.
Registration is the mechanism which observers make model known about them.
There are a few methods which can be used when registering observers into models.
Class constructor
Parameters: |
|
---|
Observes the given model among the others already observed.
Parameter: | model – the Model instance to observe. |
---|
Stops observing the given model which was being previously observed.
Parameter: | model – the Model instance to relieve. |
---|
Since it is common to observe one model, the class constructor provides the possibility to specify it.
When an OP gets changed, notifications are sent by the framework to observer’s methods. As we see in previous chapter, changes can happen at:
Independently on the notification type, the prototype of notification methods in observers is always:
Parameters: |
|
---|
How is an observer’s method declared to be notification method for an OP? It is possible to declare notification methods statically or dynamically.
Statically with decorator @Observer.observe. For example:
from gtkmvc import Observer
class MyObserver (Observer):
@Observer.observe('prop1', assign=True)
@Observer.observe('prop2', assign=True, signal=True)
def notifications(self, model, prop_name, info):
# this is called when 'prop1' or 'prop2' are assigned
# and also when 'prop2.emit()' is called
return
@Observer.observe('prop1', assign=True)
def other_notification(self, model, prop_name, info):
# this is called when 'prop1' is assigned
return
Notice that an OP can be bound to multiple notifications, like prop1 in the example. Also notice that the type of the notification (assign, signal, etc.) is declared by means of keyword arguments flags. We are discussing types and keyword arguments later in this section.
Dynamically with method Observer.observe. For example:
from gtkmvc import Observer
class MyObserver (Observer):
def __init__(self):
Observer.__init__(self)
self.observe(self.notification, "prop1", assign=True)
self.observe(self.notification, "prop2", assign=True, signal=True)
return
def notification(self, model, prop_name, info):
# ...
return
As you can see, Observer.observe can be used both as decorator and instance method to declare notifications. When used dynamically (as instance method), the only difference is that it takes as first argument the method to declare as notification.
Class Observer provides some other methods wich are useful when dealing with dynamic definition of notifications. In particular:
Returns a set of methods which have been registered as notifications for a property.
Parameter: | prop_name – the name of the property. |
---|---|
Returns: | a set of methods. |
Removes a previously defined notification method for a property set.
Parameters: |
|
---|
Returns True if given method is a notification for given property name.
Parameters: |
|
---|---|
Returns: | a boolean value. |
Warning
Version 1.99.1 does not provide a full support for definition of dynamic behaviours yet. In particular it is necessary at the moment to declare dynamic notifications before registering the models the notifications are interested in. Next version will provide a better support.
We anticipated that parameter info of change notification is a dictionary whose content depends on the notification type. Actually info is an instance of class NTInfo (Notification Type Information).
NTInfo derives from dict type, but offers the possibility to access to its values by accessing keys as attributes:
# ...
info['key'] = 20 # access with key
info.key += 1 # access with attribute
print info.key # 21
When defining a notification method, e.g. statically with decorator:
@Observer.observe('prop2', assign=True, signal=True, foo="a-value-for-foo")
def notifications(self, model, prop_name, info):
# ...
return
Instance info in method notification will contain some of the keyword arguments and associated values which were specified at declaration time:
@Observer.observe('prop2', assign=True, signal=True, foo='a-value-for-foo')
def notifications(self, model, prop_name, info):
assert info['assign'] ^ info.signal
assert 'a-value-for-foo' == info.foo
return
In particular, in each notification call only one of the keyword arguments identifying the type of the notification is set. All the other keyword arguments are copied as they are.
Apart from keyword parameters used when declaring the notification method, info contains also attributes:
- model: the model containing the OP which was changed. This is also passed to the notification method as first argument.
- prop_name: the name of the OP which was changed. This is also passed to the notification method as second argument.
The standard remaining content of info depends on the notification type it is passed along to, and it is listed in detail now.
It is possible to have one method be declared as a notification for several properties. E.g.:
@Observer.observe('prop1', assign=True, signal=True, foo1='value1')
@Observer.observe('prop2', after=True, foo2='value2')
@Observer.observe('prop3', assign=True, before=True, foo3='value3')
def notify(self, model, prop_name, info):
# ...
return
When invoked, the notification’s info parameter will be filled with data according to each declaration. In the example, only the assign notification regarding prop2 will carry key foo2 in the info parameter.
However, when declaring a method as a notification for a property, that property cannot be occur in other declarations regarding the same method:
@Observer.observe('prop1', assign=True, signal=True, foo1='value1')
@Observer.observe('prop2', after=True, foo2='value2')
@Observer.observe('prop2', assign=True, before=True, foo3='value3') #ERROR!
def notify(self, model, prop_name, info):
# ...
return
The type of the notification method is decided at declaration time, by using specific flags as keyword arguments. Later in the notification method, parameter info will carry specific information which depend on the notification type. In the following table details of all the supported types are presented.
Keyword argument to be used on Observer.observe: assign=True
Keyword argument to be used on Observer.observe: before = True
The mutable instance which is being changed.
Type: | <any mutable> |
---|
The name of the instance’s method which is being called to change the instance.
Type: | string |
---|
List of actual arguments passed to the instance’s method which is being called.
Type: | list |
---|
Dictionary of the keyword arguments passed to the instance’s method which is being called.
Type: | dict |
---|
Keyword argument to be used on Observer.observe: after = True
This is similar to before but features an attribute to carry the return value of the method.
The mutable instance which has been changed.
Type: | instance |
---|
The name of the instance’s method which has been called to change the instance.
Type: | string |
---|
List of actual arguments passed to the instance’s method which has been called.
Type: | list |
---|
Dictionary of the keyword arguments passed to the instance’s method which has been called.
Type: | dict |
---|
The value returned by the instance’s method.
Type: | <any> |
---|
Notification methods behaves exactly like any normal method when classes are derived. When overriding notification methods in derived classes, it is not necessary to re-declare them as notification methods, as any information provided in base classes is retained untouched in derived classes.
For example:
from gtkmvc import Observer, Model, Signal
class MyModel (Model):
prop1 = Signal()
__observables__ = ("prop1",)
pass # end of class BaseObs
class BaseObs (Observer):
@Observer.observe("prop1", assign=True, user_data="my-data-in-BaseObs")
def notification(self, model, name, info):
print "BaseObs.notification:", model, name, info
return
pass # end of class BaseObs
class DerObs (BaseObs):
def notification(self, model, name, info):
print "DerObs.notification:", model, name, info
return
pass # end of class BaseObs
m = MyModel()
do = DerObs(m)
m.prop1 = Signal()
The execution of this code will output:
DerObs.notification: <__main__.MyModel object ..> prop1
{ 'model': <__main__.MyModel object ...>,
'prop_name': 'prop1',
'assign': True,
'old': <gtkmvc.observable.Signal object at 0x12a6110>,
'new': <gtkmvc.observable.Signal object at 0x12a64d0>,
'user_data': 'my-data-in-BaseObs' }
As you see the actually called method is meth:DerObs.notification, even if the method in DerObs is not explicitly declared to be a notification method. Furthermore, the keyword arguments specified at declaration time in class BaseObs are passed down to info untouched.
Sometimes it is useful to re-define notification methods in derived class. In this case it is sufficient to use again static or dynamic declaration in derived class. It is important to notice here that when notifications in derived classes are redefined, notifications in base classes are hidden. For example:
from gtkmvc import Observer, Model, Signal
class MyModel (Model):
prop1 = Signal()
__observables__ = ("prop1",)
pass # end of class BaseObs
class BaseObs (Observer):
@Observer.observe("prop1", assign=True, user_data="my-data-in-BaseObs")
def notification(self, model, name, info):
print "BaseObs.notification:", model, name, info
return
pass # end of class BaseObs
class DerObs (BaseObs):
@Observer.observe("prop1", signal=True,
user_data="my-data-in-DerObs",
other_data="other-data-in-DerObs")
def notification(self, model, name, info):
print "DerObs.notification:", model, name, info
return
pass # end of class BaseObs
m = MyModel()
do = DerObs(m)
m.prop1 = Signal()
m.prop1.emit("wake up!")
The execution of this code produces the output:
DerObs.notification: <__main__.MyModel object ...> prop1
{ 'model': <__main__.MyModel object ...>,
'prop_name': 'prop1',
'signal': True,
'arg': 'wake up!',
'user_data': 'my-data-in-DerObs',
'other_data': 'other-data-in-DerObs' }
Notice that even if prop1 has been assigned, the assign notification has not been sent, as DerObs.notification() intercepts only signals and BaseObs.notification() is shadowed by it.
However, if we declare DerObs.notification() to receive both assign and signal notifications:
class DerObs (BaseObs):
@Observer.observe("prop1", signal=True, assign=True,
user_data="my-data-in-DerObs",
other_data="other-data-in-DerObs")
def notification(self, model, name, info):
print "DerObs.notification:", model, name, info
return
pass # end of class BaseObs
The execution produces two notifications as expected:
DerObs.notification: <__main__.MyModel object ...> prop1
{ 'model': <__main__.MyModel object ...>,
'prop_name': 'prop1',
'assign': True,
'old': <gtkmvc.observable.Signal object at 0x7fc5098ab110>,
'new': <gtkmvc.observable.Signal object at 0x7fc5098ab4d0>,
'user_data': 'my-data-in-DerObs',
'other_data': 'other-data-in-DerObs' }
DerObs.notification: <__main__.MyModel object ...> prop1
{ 'model': <__main__.MyModel object ...>,
'prop_name': 'prop1',
'signal': True,
'arg': 'wake up!',
'user_data': 'my-data-in-DerObs',
'other_data': 'other-data-in-DerObs' }
Old style notifications (version 1.99.0 and older) were implicitly declared by exploiting a naming convention. NTInfo was not supported, and notification methods had different signatures depending on the notification type.
For example, an assign type notification method for property prop1 was defined as:
def property_prop1_value_change(self, model, old, new):
# ...
return
after type notifications were more complicated:
def property_prop1_after_change(self, model, instance,
method_name, res, args, kwargs):
# ...
return
If this implicit mechanism is still supported for backward compatibility, is should be not used anymore in new code, use static or dynamic declaration mechanisms instead.
In release 1.99.0 featured an experimental decorator @observer.observes which could be used for multiple properties assign-type only notifications:
@observer.observes ("prop1", "prop2")
def notification(self, model, name, old, new):
# ...
return
This decorator has been fully substituted by Observer.observe and should be not used anymore. However, it is still supported.